Reasoning about other people's beliefs: bilinguals have an advantage.

نویسندگان

  • Paula Rubio-Fernández
  • Sam Glucksberg
چکیده

Bilingualism can have widespread cognitive effects. In this article we investigate whether bilingualism might have an effect on adults' abilities to reason about other people's beliefs. In particular, we tested whether bilingual adults might have an advantage over monolingual adults in false-belief reasoning analogous to the advantage that has been observed with bilingual children. Using a traditional false-belief task coupled with an eye-tracking technique, we found that adults in general suffer interference from their own perspective when reasoning about other people's beliefs. However, bilinguals are reliably less susceptible to this egocentric bias than are monolinguals. Moreover, performance on the false-belief task significantly correlated with performance on an executive control task. We argue that bilinguals' early sociolinguistic sensitivity and enhanced executive control may account for their advantage in false-belief reasoning.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Believers' estimates of God's beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people's beliefs.

People often reason egocentrically about others' beliefs, using their own beliefs as an inductive guide. Correlational, experimental, and neuroimaging evidence suggests that people may be even more egocentric when reasoning about a religious agent's beliefs (e.g., God). In both nationally representative and more local samples, people's own beliefs on important social and ethical issues were con...

متن کامل

Reasoning About Knowledge in Economics

Reasoning about other people's reasoning and knowledge about other people's knowledge lie at the heart of game theory and economic theory. Each person affects everybody else. You cannot decide what to do without some knowledge or belief about what others will do; and this must be based on an estimate of their knowledge and beliefs, about substantive matters as well as about what they think abou...

متن کامل

Formalizing Belief Reports - The Approach and a Case Study

One of the most interesting puzzles in formalizing belief contexts is the fact that many belief reports can be given both an opaque and a transparent readings. A traditional explanation is that the two readings are related to the failure and success of the principle of sub-stitutivity respectively, and this in turn is explained with the de re/de dicto distinction. We propose an alternative anal...

متن کامل

Formalizing Opacity and Transparency in Belief Contexts

One of the most interesting puzzles in formalizing belief contexts is the fact that many belief reports can be given both an opaque and a transparent reading. A traditional explanation is that the two readings are related to the failure and success of the principle of substitutivity respectively, and this in turn is explained with the de re/de dicto distinction. We propose an alternative analys...

متن کامل

Formalizing Belief Reports the Approach and a Case Study ? 1 Beliefs and Substitutivity

One of the most interesting puzzles in formalizing belief contexts is the fact that many belief reports can be given both an opaque and a transparent readings. A traditional explanation is that the two readings are related to the failure and success of the principle of sub-stitutivity respectively, and this in turn is explained with the de re/de dicto distinction. We propose an alternative anal...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition

دوره 38 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012